I have never been so convinced in my life as I have been now that the best choice for America is Senator Hillary Clinton.For myself, the issue is much less Senator Clinton's gender than her experience, integrity, determination, and intelligence.
Senator Clinton's experience is evident and I will not re-post the Senators resume here.
Senator Clinton's integrity has been attacked consistently over the years and the Senator has taken the high road equally as consistent, which to me demonstrates a cool head and a great conviction of her own actions and beliefs.
Senator Clinton's determination in the face of trials and tribulations she has faced has only proven her strength of Character and unyielding perseverance against adversity.
Senator Clinton's Intelligence is also self-evident, a successful attorney, a brilliant first Lady, an advocate for the American people, a wife, a mother, a best selling author, and a faithful public servant as Senator.
When it comes to some of those "trials and tribulations" consider this; First lady Hillary Clinton had the foresight to begin acting on health care some 15 years ago. Had Congress listened to her then, would health care be an issue today, in this election?
As for family values, I can see no one with greater family values than Senator Clinton. The adversity and pain she went through we are all aware of, yet she was able to save her family, not destroy it.
As a Christian she is aware that her religion is based on sacrifice. As we all know, family, sometimes requires our sacrifices. So as a Christian she has walked the walk.
Lastly, as to Senator Clinton's gender, while this is precedent setting, I believe this makes the Senator, the " insider who is an outsider ".
Now that's the making of a great Presidency and a great America.
God Bless Senator Clinton, God Bless America.
And on to the white house !!!!!
Roman B. Aleksander
US ARMY VET
31 October 2007
Best Choice for America
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Let’s face it, when you get right down to it, all of liberalism is fueled by a singular strategy—a strategy which has been continually perfected and relentlessly executed over the past forty years. That strategy is very basic. It’s goal is to promote and exploit divisiveness.
It seems that everything liberal politicians do is based on this simple principle. Tell the people that are given to hating the most, that they are the ones who are hated. Tell the people who expect the most, that they deserve more. Tell blacks to hate whites. Tell women to hate men. Tell the lazy to hate the motivated. Tell the poor that only conservatives are rich, and then be sure to tell them to hate them for it.
Class warfare, race baiting, name calling and man-hating—all with a singular goal: to get themselves in power by promoting and exploiting divisiveness. Of course, once this divisiveness turns into frenzy, these same people suddenly act as if they actually want to solve a problem that didn’t even exist before they did everything they possibly could to create it.
To liberals, every issue, every situation is an opportunity to divide. History, religion, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the death of a soldier, a political debate, the hurricane which devastated New Orleans. Every tragedy exploited to divide. Every victory belittled to divide. Every incident, every word, every distorted statistic, every holiday—you name it, they will find some way to divide it.
Unfortunately, it’s not just the politicians who promote and exploit divisiveness; it is the people as well. Malcontents, jealous of anyone with any sort of success, come up with any way they can to attack those who are more successful then they are. Someone is rich only because they stole something from them. Certain groups are more successful only because they took advantage of them. Work has nothing to do with it. Intelligence has nothing to do with it. Planning ahead has nothing to do with it. Even luck has nothing to do with it.
And what do these kinds of people view as the solution to this imaginary injustice? Why special rights, privileges and opportunities for themselves, of course. Level the playing field. Get something for nothing. Take from the rich, the white, the male dominated, homophobic society that has already given them everything. Take what they have, what they built, what they earned—whether it be money, property, liberty or opportunity—and find some way, some justification, some cause or some guise to redistribute it to the people who have done nothing to earn it. To people who refuse to compete on merit. To people who insist on taking more out of society than what they put in to it. To people who don’t give a damn that their inclusion comes only at the expense of someone else’s exclusion. The strategy is simple, really—promote divisiveness and then exploit it for your own benefit.
Liberals should thank God every day for differences between people because without them, liberalism would be dead in the water. Without them, the country might have some stability. Without them, it might have a chance to survive. Without them, the problems between those who want and those who have might actually be manageable in some meaningful or productive way. But differences have given liberals the perfect opportunity to stop any rational discussion dead in its tracks. Differences have led to polarization. Differences have led to countries within a country. Differences have led to the dreaded xist-ism-monger-phobia. Differences have allowed liberals to add any of these four sounds to the end of any word they choose, virtually guaranteeing that they can get away with anything they want.
Worse yet, liberals actually have the nerve to turn around and endlessly accuse conservatives of divisiveness. To them, conservatives— who believe everyone should be held to the same standards—are somehow divisive. To them, conservatives—who believe everyone should have the same rights regardless of the guises used to justify different ones for different people—are somehow divisive. To them, conservatives—who sacrifice their time, money, careers and often their lives to defend the true meaning of freedom and liberty—are somehow divisive.
But the reality is that divisiveness does not come from those who are trying to make some contribution to our society. The reality is that divisiveness does not come from those who expect others to at least try to do the same. The reality is that divisiveness comes from those who are always trying to get something out of a society far beyond what they are willing to put back in.
Case in point about what I’m talking about can be seen here: http://www.democracyforamerica.com/users/268104-roman-aleksander. If Mr. Aleksander spent more time trying to work with people on his side of the political aisle as well as others on the right, maybe he wouldn’t seem like such a little beotch and actually get something done worthile.
The reality is that divisiveness comes from those who are always trying to get something for nothing.
The anonymous commenter exemplifies conservatism at its best. That being a failed and delusional idealogy desperately trying to justify its own inconsistancies and "do nothing" status quo mentality.
Liberalism is about justice, and if that ruffles the feathers of the right-wing, so be it.
It takes more than waving a flag twice year on memorial day and the 4th of July to be a proud American. You need to actually be a part of the America you CLAIM to be so proud of.
Post a Comment