Why Senator Clinton will Win.

Senator Clinton has the best chance to win.

Polarizing, energizing? Yes fine, So is Bush, so are
the Republicans, so is the War.

We had a "non" polorizing candidate in Kerry.

I didnt vote "for" Kerry. I voted "AGAINST" Bush.
I don't need to tell you what happened!

Lets look at the General election possible voting pattern for Clinton:

Women...yep
Black vote ..come on they are NOT gonna vote repub
unless our nominiee is david Duke.
Liberal vote... yep
Hispanic vote.. I think so
Unless she picks Richardson (which I think she will)
THEN its a big YEP!!!!
Gay vote...yep
Millitary/Vets...yep

On the other side the repubs will be energized to
vote for who.........

At this point its Guiliani or Romney

Hey vote for me cuz.......I'm....
for gay rights....... just like Hillary
pro choice ...........just like Hillary
.................just like Hillary

Pat Robertson a couple of days ago endorsed PRO CHOICE Guiliani.


Their CANDIDATES:

Romney, Talk about flip flop. AND NOT in a good way,
like he's learned from a mistake or something.

Its like..... he really just doesnt care!
Need to be pro gay..ok
Need to be anti gay ..ok
Pro choice....ok
Anti choice...ok.
I'm rich, your not, why am I here.

Mayor POTHOLE ?????
Dude, ASPHALT is NOT foreign policy.
His big claim to fame ...9-11.
AND he's the guy that put the Citys emergency headquarters
in the world trade center AGAINST the advice of EVERYBODY.
So the one place he's suppose to have credibility ...HE DOESNT.

McCain.... Mr. "I was shot in the azz and was a Prisoner"......
Give him a medal and a book deal NOT the Presidency.
He shouldnt have even have been a Senator.

Huckabee.... He's got NO probelms with honesty.
He is 100% Honest.
He really believes the world is flat!

The "Republic party" Your bridge to the 12th Century !!

Welcome to the ERA of MADAME President !!

Analysis Final

Ok, Here's the Final.

#1 Clinton-Kucinich
#2 Biden
#3 Dodd
#4 Richardson
#5 Obama
#6 Edwards

Clinton-

Senator Clinton, walking in with the most to lose due to her lead and due to that she flubbed the last debate, walked in fairly confidently considering the pressure of a back to back lose, which could have cost her dearly. Her early "Asbestos" quip was a gamble. If she did well, it would indeed be a "ha ha" which would reinforce her lead and initial confidence. If she flubbed again, her own quip would have flung her into Gravel status.
Clinton did not have the best line of the night but she had the most:
"I'm not being attacked because I'm a Woman, I'm being attacked because I'm ahead."
"I'm not playing the gender Card I'm trying to play the winning card."
Slapping down Edwards with "Slinging mud right out of the Republican playbook."
(From which Edwards never recovered)
"NAFTA did not do as it was hoped." Ok, Lame. But she said it.
On Kyl-Lieberman Clinton said EXACTLY what I stated in my post a few days ago.
"Aggressive diplomacy thru strength"
Link
On drivers licenses for illegal's she said "No" (Which I disagree with, but who am I but a big mouth who thinks he's right all the time. {stick out tongue here} )
She hurt herself here, but with who?? Illegal's don't vote. With the legal immigrants? Quite possibly yes.
By the same token this helped her with Republicans and Republican leaning Independents.
(Which is exactly why I think she will pick Richardson as VP as stated in my post some days ago.) Link

Kucinich-

I Knew this guy was good. He got the most memorable line of the night of course. "Because I read it"
Referring to the Patriot act of course.
Then he proceeded to "slam" Edwards with the China trade deal "take responsibility,as a trial lawyer you knew better." Edwards was down for the count after this. (if he got a "slap" before, this was the KO)
He pulled no punches and stated his positions clearly. He did not seem all to happy up there either.
Which, strangely, gave him even more credibility by looking disgusted with the other candidates.
The only candidate who would not vote for the Dem nominee "Unless they would not use war as a policy"
This guy couldn't have had a better night. NO UFO'S.

Biden-

This is the Guy that also came on cheerful, jovial, not a care in the world.
Why?? Because he had NOTHING to lose.
And he was total "Joe"
Along with the easy going mode he was in, he spoke with authority due to his experience.
This guy knew what he was talking about. And the only one who calmly, as-a-matter-of-factly countered Kucinich on the damage of the Patriot Act, like he was saying "good morning."
Leaving me with the feeling of "Presidential."

Dodd-

Dodd laid out what Dem's need to do to win the White House, and keep the House and Senate.
Effective on Unity. With the time he did get he spoke very well and very well in Spanish. While it was impressive, somehow it just wasn't the big bang.
He spoke with Authority but also with anger. Although I'm not sure at what. Is it just the way he speaks??
He was effective. Anyone remember him today??

Richardson-

"My name is Bill Richardson" ---Did the trick !! Ingratiating and approachable.
He was strong on education.
He was for DL "for" illegal's.
And was "for" Hero cards for Veterans. Which left me wondering about everyone else. That's a lot of people to leave out.
Environment, yada, yada, ....Gore.
Reminded me of Gore. Plus or minus? up to you!!

Obama-
Next is Obama, which has only moved up because Edwards moved down.
This was the biggest surprise for both supporters and critics alike.
If anyone "lost" the debate this is it.
Coming in with the loudest applause, Senator Obama was one of the two boo-ed for going negative on Clinton. (uh-oh Iowa)
The attempt was there. It just didn't come thru. Hemming and hawing, all the things he was accusing of, but not being accused of, until now.
The only effective point he made was on the China trade policy. " Why isn't the U.S. insisting on our inspectors inspecting over in China? Like Japan is."
On social security was a valiant attempt but just did not break the glass ceiling.
Hold on!! When he said he wanted to "build schools in the Middle East" I fell off my chair!
HUH?? Economy bad, Debt up to eyeballs, no oil dividend, a "money pit" war, housing market, 37 million Americans starving! AND he's going to build schools in the Middle East?
For the guys that would love to bring us ....9-11......
9-12....9-13.....9-14----9-15 etc. ????
Looks like the Naive thing is not gone today.
Want to know why I'm not going into his mixed energy policy??
Exactly ! Why?

Edwards-

Was he even there? After he was slapped down with his own "mud"
His "attack strategy backfired. Not only for himself but for Obama.
After this his answers seemed "canned"
The last, nail in this coffin tonight was the boo.


TrueBlue

Republicans Realize Senator WILL WIN.

Former House majority leader Dick Armey says Senator Clinton would win.

Not just the Primary but the General Election.

Thats Not an endorsement, but it does sound like an inevitablity.

Hell even the Republicans are Convinced !!

Thats why they're attacking so heavy!

Link

They clearly know where the danger is, quite simply the others are no danger.

The GOP is Scarred SILLY about The Senator.

First we hear, "She's a LIBERAL "
Then we hear, "SHE IS A REPUBLICAN"
Then we heard "She cant win"
Now we hear.... "She cant lose"

They are trying any and all tactics, and anything that freeks the repubs out THAT much MUST be good!

US ARMY VET

Ma Dem & Paw Republican

Ma Dem & Paw Republican.

Picture this:

Ma DEM and Paw Republican, are sitting at home one day
and Ma has to go on a trip for a while(1995). Paw's got
the "house" all to himself.

Well he finds he cant handle the "house" all by himself
and invites his friends to come and help him.
They wash the dishes, they mow the lawn, they cook the food,
they make the beds,they wash the car and take care of the kids.
Now after a while Ma DEM gets back from her trip(2007)and she
finds a house full of "friends".
Paw Republican realizes the house is preety full and says
to Ma, "what are we gonna do Ma??"
Ma says "well their your friends arent they"
Paw looks around and says "heck no Ma, I never invited
this many of them, they're just freeloaders!!"
Ma Dem looks around and with a sigh says to Paw " well
I guess they cant stay here we'll have to help em get
a place of there own down the street."
Paw Republican with a look of utter horror says
"Thats your great Idea? You want to HELP these freeloaders
AND have them live down the street??"
"Ma thats a terrible Idea and I want to know what your
gonna do about this? Its your fault you know,you've been
gone fer a good spell."
Ma Dem, being all tukered out from the trip, sits
down turns to Paw and says "with all our good fortune
Paw cant we help em out?" Paw, his anger
building replys.................To Be Continued.

US ARMY VET

Liberal Agenda?

For a very long time I have been hearing about a "Liberal Agenda".
I think it is worth examining, as it rolls off the rightwingers
tongues with a loathing and easy contempt.

What is it ??
If, by "liberal agenda" they mean....

Keeping Social Security viable for those most in need in our
society and those who have already worked a lifetime
contributing to a system geared to regular folks.
Something the "right" wants to "privatize",in other
words eliminate.To insure Government regulation of
"for profit" companies so we don't have rampant corporate
theft and massive exploitation of hard working Americans.
To insure Government regulation of the food industry.
So people wont have to test their own ground beef for
mad cow or Ecoli. To insure Government regulation of
imported goods.So YOU don't have to test for dangerous
lead content. Government regulation is government doing
its job!To ensure that those who have the ability to go
on to higher education do so. To insure Universal health care
for all Citizens.If we can afford a war we can afford health
care for all Americans.When our government tells us that
"Universal Health care for Iraqi's is sound policy, but for
Americans its SOCIALISM, its time for a new government.
If every individual is "entitled" an attorney, whether
or not he/she can afford one, than I believe by virtue of
citizentry alone, EVERY American is "ENTITLED" to
Universal health care.Insurance companies "compassion" for
my illness should not end where their PROFIT/LOSS margins begin.
If my health determines your profit and my illness decides
your loses,than you would want me either... healthy or dead.
That's NOT a very good system for health care.To insure our
nation never invades, attacks or aggrieves any
Sovereign nation(s) that commit no provocation or threat.
Such as Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq.To insure
"equal protection under the law"For all people.
Not just some people but all people.Not just some rights
but all rights.If you fall into the category of Human Being,
you are "entitled" to the same rights as all other
people.Straight people, gay people, black people,
religious people,non-religious people, ALL... people.
Please let us all remember these words;
"Those who will not stand up for the rights of others put
their own rights in danger of being lost as well.
To insure that there is freedom of religion.
To insure that YOUR freedom of religion ends where MINE begin,
religious or otherwise.To insure that everyone pays
their fair share of taxes.
"Taxes are the price our society pays to invoke the word
Civilization upon itself"~~Thomas Jefferson***
Anyone who would insinuate that taxing someone $3 million
on an income of $10 million a year, is being "punished"
for their hard work is among the worlds biggest lunatics.
#1 anyone who "makes" $10 million a year is NOT digging
ditches or working hard. (He may have done so to get there
but lets be clear, once he gets there he is NOT working hard.)
Hard work is many things, it is also hard work to be really
poor with no job. Ask a welfare recipient if its not hard
work trying to make ends meet? Try to figure out how to
pay $1660 worth of expenses on $1100 a month. Gas or electric?
Telephone or cable?Clothes or rent? Food or medicine?
Can't imagine? No, neither can I !
#2 It is NOT punishment to pay your fair share!!
"To those whom much is given, much is expected"
To insure the basic necessities of existence for every citizen.
Food, shelter, health care, disaster relief.
To do any less is not humane, to do more is Private charity.
To rely on private charity alone leads to the following;
Private charity leads to public homelessness.
Private charity breeds demoralization and contempt.
OUR RIGHT TO, OUR ENTITLEMENT TO, THESES THINGS:
"Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"
These are things that are not for sale and have been paid for
IN FULL by the Americans that came before us.
For ....all Americans.
Anyone having a problem with these precepts must have
a problem with the Constitution and the notion
"United We Stand".
And finally, To forever insure the proper correlation between
our law and our justice.

Our Future, will of course, end up being our children's history.
How will you, YOU, write that book?
Think your vote means little? Think again.

Liberal Agenda??? It use to be called the American Way.

Roman B. Aleksander
US ARMY VET

For republican voters, that's THOMAS Jefferson~3rd President Not GEORGE Jefferson~dry cleaner ***

Republican Love of America

Republicans wave the flag, wear flag lapel pins, claim to "love America".
How can ANYONE exhibiting these characteristics do the following...

#1Attempt to eliminate Social Security.

#2Succeed in elimination of Student aid and Student loans for education.

#3Succeed in "gutting" Americas social services (Unemployment, SSI, Disability,Food stamps)

#4Attempt to turn public roads, highways and bridges into private toll roads.

#5Claim to spread "freedom and democracy" everywhere EXCEPT the USA.

#6Enact "business friendly" laws which actually mean "exploit" hard working Americans.

#7Claim that Universal health care for Iraqis and Israelis is "sound policy" but Universal health care for Americans is... SOCIALISM.

#8Claim that Republican debt is somehow better for the country than Democratic surplus.

#9Cut funding and benefits of Veterans.

#10.... " Write your own #10 here"

So the question remains .."Why do Republicans, who claim to love America, clearly hate Americans?"

US ARMY VET

What do Republicans HATE??

Hate the FACT that fox noise never states FACTS ???

Hate the FACT that YOU keep votin Republican but work harder and for less MONEY every year they are in power???

Hate the FACT that you have no healthcare, or if you do, CANT afford to get sick anyway??

Hate the FACT that you havent had a vacation in SEVEN years???

Hate the FACT that YOUR $600 tax cut has done NOTHING for you, but the MILLIONARE who got $50,000 actually benefited.????

Hate the FACT that YOU are planning a FUNERAL while bush is planning a WEDDING????

Hate the FACT that you cant afford your kids college tuition and the repubs CUT student aid.
Cut student loans for Americans.???

Hate the FACT that you have to clean the house of an Indian or Chinese Doctor cuz their SOCIALIST government PAID for their kids to become DOCTORS.???

Hate the FACT that "Business Friendly " REALLY means "SCREW THE EMPLOYEE" ???

Hate the FACT that the dollar is worth crapola cuz bush borrowed TRILLIONS??
(think that house costs $600K, Nope, its just that your dollar aint worth crapola.!!)

Hmmm sounds like you JUST............. HATE ............... FACTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!


US ARMY VET